heidikins.com


Water under the bridge
2010 October 13, 11:24 am
Filed under: Bulldog A. McGunsmoke, Love 101, Relationships

Last weekend I attended the wedding of a very dear friend; the ceremony was beautiful and the happy couple was shining and glowing and so in-love it would make you nauseous—in a good way. The man who married them said something that hit me like a ton of proverbial bricks, and I would like to paraphrase it here:

“In a little while, Mr. Groom, something will happen and you will find your Bride’s angelic halo is askew and slightly dulled; she is not perfect. However, instead of pointing out her flaws and demanding the halo be righted, you need to go to a quiet place and sincerely ponder the things about yourself that are not perfect and that need to be improved upon. After making a short list of your own flaws it will surprise you how quickly again she will shine. In the same vein, Ms. Bride, when you discover a smudge on your Groom’s armor, when his horse seems not so white or his shield so shiny, I want you to go somewhere private and make a list of your own dents and smudges. In just a moment Mr. Groom’s armor will again be dazzling and his heart pure.”

I love this. I love the idea that to find happiness in a relationship one must perfect oneself instead of constantly pointing out the flaws in your partner. (As a disclosure: I am well-aware that I am not perfect; I am constantly in the middle of having my rough edges worn off, a process called “life” that will hopefully turn my harsh and spiky bits into beautiful, smooth spaces.)

Once upon a time a very wise teacher interrupted a mob of angry, self-righteous men who were ready to stone a woman to death for her crimes. This man said “He who is without sin, let him cast the first stone.” Her crimes are not my crimes, and that mob is not this mob, but in recent weeks I have been assaulted with virtual stones, and the emotional cuts and bruises have been cause for thought, concern, frustration, tears, rage and finally resolution.

I have dated several people throughout my time as a blogger and with the notable exception of my ex-husband, I have never spoken ill of a former love interest on this site. I believe in freedom of speech, but I also believe strongly that slander and libel are not only unbecoming but also hurtful, unnecessary, and a very quick way to land yourself in the middle of a lawsuit. I am not running a dirty, muckraking campaign; highlighting the flaws of a former boyfriend will not benefit anyone. I will not broadcast the unknightly characteristics of someone I used to love. I will not write a defamatory post (or 3-part mini-series) using personal and private moments from the relationship as ammunition in a one-sided virtual crusade. I do not feel the need to splash his most intimate hurts and struggles across the pages of the internet, demanding you agree with my actions or validate my behavior. I do not need to justify why a relationship didn’t work out to my readers, to my friends, or to my family. It just didn’t work out.

I don’t want bad blood, and I don’t want bad karma. I was hoping to get away with not having to write the “End of the Relationship” post, but recent events have caused me to reconsider.

The Bulldog has been mostly absent from this blog for a number of months. Things were great, then they were rocky, and now they are over. He is a good man and in many ways a great man. He is loyal and patient and romantic. He has written notes, sent chocolates, flowers or sour-patch kids and even a massage therapist after a particularly rough week. He has played his guitar, offered foot rubs, and indulged my love of long motorcycle rides. The Bulldog has a “Hero Complex”, but mostly in a good way (if there was ever an End-of-the-World crisis situation I can’t think of anyone I’d rather have at my side). In so many ways he is amazing and wonderful. But in just a few ways, he is not the guy for me—and those are the reasons we are no longer together. Even with his faults and flaws, I wish him happiness, health, love and success.

The End.



Blue Eyes
2010 July 20, 4:30 pm
Filed under: Love 101, Relationships

Over the last couple of weeks I have had several sightings of ex-boyfriends—nothing overly dramatic or explosive—I just keep having these coincidental run-ins at the grocery store, on campus, at a concert, through an out-of-the-blue email.  Most of these instances have been rather pleasant, we were friendly, exchanged niceties, asked the appropriate questions and proceeded along with our own activities.  I would like to take this opportunity to thank The Universe for mostly normal ex-boyfriends.  Example: to date not a single one has been listed on America’s Most Wanted, featured on Jerry Springer, or convicted of some horrible crime.  This may seem like ludicrously low expectations, but sometimes a girl needs a reminder that she has a little class when choosing someone to date.

Let’s talk about dating for a minute, shall we?  I know the last few months I have been terrifically light on posting anything at all.  Part of that is a lack-of-time issue.  Part of that was some romantical dramatics.  And then there is your general “I’ll shove this under my virtual (proverbial?) rug instead of splashing it about the internet” kind of situations.  At any rate, I have something I need to toss around a bit; please tolerate my indulgence.

Favorite Ex-boyfriends (or ex-girlfriends*): I certainly hope you have one.  Until recently, my favorite ex-boyfriend was Berkley/Adam/Dr. Mac.  I can’t say enough nice things about him, both as a boyfriend and as a dentist (seriously, Salt Laker’s, he’ll fix your teeth real good.)—but instead of singing his praises I’d like to talk about someone else.  I have to tread carefully here, I don’t want to smash anyone’s toes and I certainly don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings.  I do, however, want to discuss something important; I need to write about it to give myself a little clarity on the subject.  Blogging is a form of therapy to me, so imagine you are sitting in a big, comfy leather chair with a notebook, pen poised, and imagine I am laying on the couch, staring at the ceiling, telling you a story. 

I usually begin stories like this with “Once upon a time,” but I feel awkward starting out that way while I’m on the couch, it seems disingenuous or something.  Moving on.  I’ve never talked about Blue Eyes before, at least not here, I wouldn’t ever describe him as my “boyfriend.”  But in the interest of full disclosure he and I hung out/dated for a while not that long ago.  Our “break-up” was very mutual, drama-free, and took all of 3 minutes to communicate.  (Why can’t all break-ups be like that?)(All these terms are in quotes simply for the purposes of this post.  If you aren’t boyfriend/girlfriend with someone you can’t very well break-up.  And since I never thought of, called or referred to Blue Eyes as my boyfriend…well, you see the logic, right?) There are some fundamentally awesome things about Blue Eyes; he’s smart, and witty, and easy to be around.  He enjoys conversationalizification as much as I do (yes, that’s a word.  Sound it out.) and most of our interactions revolved around long discussions about Life, Love and the Meaning of the Universe. (Yes, The Universe.  Blue Eyes can be a bit of a geek at times and has all sorts of opinions about The Universe.  It’s part of his charm.)  Like anyone, he also has his flaws (as do I—a whole pile of them).  Like most relationships, there were some fundamental things between he and I that just wouldn’t work out, which is fine.  Blue Eyes and I are still friends, good friends, actually.  In fact, I think he and I are better friends now than we were while we were hanging out.  We aren’t as close (as is expected), but I think we are better friends.

Does that make any kind of sense?  Let me try and explain, because this is the reason he tops my list of Favorite Ex’s.  In our conversations (both before and after the “break up”) I came to realize some massive, fundamental flaws in myself, and have made changes towards accepting and correcting those flaws.  I also realized I had made enormous life decisions based on some very skewed, irrational data, and have made steps towards realigning some priorities.  For the record, it takes a very good friend to be able and willing to point these things out.  And for whatever reason, Blue Eyes was the first friend who was able to do so in a way that did not immediately put me on the defensive, determined to fight for my position to the death.  (Ok, maybe not to the death.)(Actually, that is probably a true statement…I can be pretty stubborn when I want to be.)

I don’t really want to get into the nitty-gritties of the conversations, but we’re talking about Big Things here; things like family and whether or not to have kids, relationships with siblings and parents and God, what it means to be a Good Man or a Good Woman.  I also believe at some point the merits of DVD vs Blu-Ray were discussed (him), heels vs. ballet flats (me) and the benefits of Robert Downey Jr. vs. any other leading man.  Big. Important. Stuff.  Now I’ve had similar Big Conversations with a dozen other people, and the end result has always been my feeling a need to be defensive and stubborn on my position and refusing to acknowledge there might be another way to see the situation, but somehow Blue Eyes managed to help me see another way.  Several other ways, actually.  I don’t really care to analyze “why” or “how” that happened, I’m just glad it did.  I feel like I was boxed into this smaller, darker life (one of my own creation and choosing, mind you) and he somehow swooped in like a pirate (do pirates swoop?) and chopped a big hole in it and now I’m trying to figure out what to do with all this sunshine.  Regardless of circumstances or timing or the who, why, when or how—this “hole of sunshine” phenomenon has been a really good thing for me.  It’s big and exciting (and scary) to see the life you thought you had all planned out alter a little, or a lot.  It’s also big and exciting (and a little scary) to wonder what other places need a little more sunshine. 

I think this is what shrink’s refer to as a “break-through”.  So, despite any other component or circumstance of this relationship with Blue Eyes, he changed the way I think, he changed the way I see myself and how I fit into my world, and he did all of that without any kind of agenda, without any malicious intent, and without any real idea that it was happening.  Blue Eyes unknowingly took some tremendous risks on me, navigating some potentially explosive conversations (explosions on par with Krakatoa, not a little firecracker) and loaded situations and he showed me these little trails through them I had never noticed before.  He brought out some of the best things in me and despite the fact that he won’t be around in ways to see or enjoy the end results of that break-through, I can really only attribute their discovery to him.  Blue Eyes is an amazing man, an incredible person and a loyal friend.  It is a rarity that a (straight) man can blaze through your world, leaving a wake of unicorns and ponies and rainbows and all other Good Things…I suppose there is also some nerdy detritus in there somewhere…USB cables and zombies and chess tournaments and what-not; what I’m trying to say is I am a better person, a more whole person, and a stronger person because of him.  And for that, my friends, he is (and will most likely remain) on the top of my Favorite Ex’s list. 

*The asterix is not because I have a favorite ex-girlfriend, it is because the phrase is not mine.  “Favorite Ex-girlfriend” is the title of a song (that I love), written by someone I love.  I don’t know the protocol for mixing two men I care about into the same post, but I feel they must be mentioned together or not at all.  If that is some kind of massive faux-pas, I hope those who could take offense will opt to forgive instead.  I’m just trying to be emotionally honest, even when it is tricky.



One More-or-Less Single Female Searching for Successful, Healthy Relationship. Outlook: Moderately Bleak.
2010 April 28, 4:44 am
Filed under: Love 101, Relationships

Relationships: they are both the bane and joy of our existence.  The baneful ones are complicated and messy and give you a severe case of eye rolling (or eye twitching) and The Sighs.  The joyful ones give you warm fuzzies, butterflies, unicorns and rainbows…or something like that. Having a plethora of bad relationships in our respective lives doesn’t necessarily mean we don’t have very good relationship skills, although I’d be hard-pressed to believe otherwise.  Corrolation and causation and all that scientific stuff can put up an awfully good argument.  However, I wouldn’t necessarily maintain that “Relationship Experts” have all joyful relationships in their lives–maybe they are just lucky.  Or lying.  How does one become a “Relationship Expert” anyway?  Do you take a bunch of classes on interpersonal communication?  Study groups of people?  Chug through reams of data on how individuals deal with each other?  That all sounds like a lot of work.  Although I think I can safely state that in order to become an expert on any given subject, one must have a lot of experience in that subject.

A few weeks ago I devoured Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers, and he states (among other, awesome things) that to become an expert you must put in at least 10,000 hours of practice time.  Whether you are talking about playing the violin, winning cases in court, or writing software programs; 10,000 hours is the magic number you must strive towards in order to maintain Expert Status.  (I should probably mention here that while I absolutely LOVED Outliers and gave it 5 stars out of 5 stars, Mr. Gladwell is not paying me for a review, nor is he sending me free stuff–although he should probably consider it because I own all of his books in hardback and half I own an additional second copy in paperback.  I’m a good customer, yo! Where’s the swag?)

Ten thousand hours.  In terms of playing the violin that sounds like an inordinate amount of time; three hours a day for a decade.  But how do you calculate hours actively spent on/in relationships? Allow me to do a little math.  (Don’t worry, you will not need a calculator to continue with this post, take a sip of your Diet Coke and just give me a moment here.)

[Insert somewhat rusty sounds of brain gears warming up, slowly cranking through equations and algorithms, quickly exhausting any functionality, giving up and laying down for a nap.]

…Ok, let me try that again, easy math this time.  I have been pursuing and being persecuted pursued by citizens of Planet Man for approximately 14.5 years.  In that time I think it is safe to say that I have gone on approximately 2,200 dates; 1,750 of which I would guesstimate have taken place in the last five years.  I have been on dozens of first dates, probably 25 blind dates, kissed [redacted] guys, and had a double handful of real relationships–some good, some horrible–that lasted anywhere from 6 months to three years.  In this particular realm of measurement, longer doesn’t necessarily mean better.  Without constant growing, nurturing and improving a relationship from both sides, there comes a point where longer is just longer.  (Yes, I’m talking about duration of relationships, get your mind out of the gutter.)

From this set of Super Scientific Data I can draw the following conclusion: In the last five years I have achieved “expert” status when it comes to dating.  This does not mean I am a Relationship Expert.  This means I know how to have and be a really great date.  I will try almost anything once (whether that is ethnic food, curling, or mountain biking), I can have a conversation–a meaningful, humorous, pleasant conversation–with anyone of moderate intelligence and I can defuse a lot of that dating awkwardness without embarrassment or resorting to cheap shenanigans (ok, at times I have perhaps employed a few shenanigans).  Alright, so I’m a great date.  Now what?  Until TLC comes up with a new reality show where I am paid thirty-seven-bazillion dollars (my standing rate to appear on any reality television show) to flounce around in fabulous outfits with amazing shoes, teaching handsome, debonair, charming-but-perhaps-slightly-shy men how to plan and execute a fabulous date–basically, the female equivalent of Hitch–without all that, I’ve got bupkiss.  So what if I’m a great date–that means nothing unless it can somehow translate into decent relationship skills.

I communicate on an above-average level for an intelligent human being, I listen well, I am willing to admit mistakes and apologize when necessary (and sometimes unnecessarily just to keep the damn peace), however I am also one to stand my ground when I firmly believe I am right.  In fact, being pushed, manipulated or bullied while under such a circumstance will never end well for the other party, the one doing the pushing/manipulating/bullying.  When I dig my heels in I dig them deep; I wear stiletto’s for a reason, people.  I understand that men and women are different, and while I wouldn’t necessary simplify it into “Men are from Mars and need Cave Time; Women are from Venus and need Mani/Pedi’s”, I do think there is a bit of truth to that comparison.  But I think that expectations and the differences that whirl around expectations, the achieving, failing and lack of, are a huge part of why men and women have a difficult and frustrating time understanding each other.

Can someone become an Expert on Expectations?  Hrm, allow me a moment to ponder this, [indiscernible pause] No.  No you cannot.  Expectations are a bitch and there is no real way around that except to have no expectations of any sort, eliminating the unfortunate situation of being disappointed.  This is not a recommended skill, however.  It’s too depressing.

Back to relationships.  A Relationship Expert is typically someone with a grundle of degrees, the author of a self-help book or–even better–a series of self-help books, who wears too much eye makeup and resorts to gender cliche’s like they are Brand New Scientifically Proven Facts.  We all know most boys would rather watch a sweaty, testosteroney sporting event than go to the ballet (despite the fact that ballet dancers have remarkable athletic abilities, especially the male ones).  But does any of that generic advice really help?  I mean, sure, if you’ve never had a real relationship, sure.  I can see how that would be useful.  Or, if you’ve never had a healthy and/or successful relationship, I can understand your interest.  I refuse to listen to someone lecture me about relationships, or even worse, pay someone to lecture me about relationships when they do not know me personally.  A personal therapist I can get behind.  A trusted friend will have my undivided attention.  A self-help seminar leaves me feeling itchy.

I am not a Relationship Expert, but I am fairly good at relationships.  In fact, I think I’d say I’m above average.  I am on good terms with most of my x-boyfriends, rarely have fights with friends, and while my siblings are delightfully quirky, we get along quite well.  Sure, I have some baggage and a few hangups when it comes to relationships, but no more than the next person.

…What am I getting at?  I’m not sure, really.  This whole 10,000-Hours-To-Become-An-Expert thing has just been rolling around in my brain for a few weeks and I needed to get it out.  Have I spent 10,000 hours on relationships?  Probably.  Am I an expert?  No.  Does that discredit Mr. Gladwell or his book?  No.  It just means that relationships are trickier than playing the violin, or arguing before a jury, or writing the code that created That Glorious Invention: The Interwebs.  Relationships have ten-thousand variables and, as a single person, my relationships are constantly changing.  I am constantly breaking up with one boy and/or starting all over again with someone else and another set of ten-thousand variables.  That doesn’t mean I suck at it, it just means it’s tricky.  Or that I’m incredibly unlucky.  Or both.

Thoughts?  Advice?  Nuggets of wisdom?  A good vent, perhaps?  Does anyone need a good relationship vent?  …Bueller?



The X-Files
2010 April 8, 5:52 am
Filed under: Love 101, Relationships

You may have some x-boyfriends who you will think of fondly; they are kind and funny and wonderful–it just didn’t work out.

You may have some x-boyfriends who you will think of and dry-heave; they are vile and disgusting and generally horrible people–thank heavens it didn’t work out.

You may have some x-boyfriends who you will think you are rid of, only to discover that through no fault of your own they are now your cousin.  True story.

You may have some x-boyfriends who you will think of occasionally with little to no emotion attached to them either way.  You dated.  You broke up.  The end.  Sure you were probably sad for a little while, but it was better to break up and, in retrospect, there wasn’t enough of a relationship there to justify trying to be friends later.

Regardless of the nature of their memory, I have recently discovered that when it comes to x-boyfriends, the world can be incredibly, disturbingly small.

Over the weekend I had a friend in town from San Francisco.  I met Erica years ago when I was dating Berkley/Adam and visiting San Fran every other weekend.   Adam and I broke up, but I have kept and cherished the girlfriends I made in San Francisco.  Here we are, several years later Erica and I are still friends who meet up for lunch or something whenever we happen to be in the same city.   Saturday night a group of girls met up for some dinner and general girl-chat.  I caught up with several of Erica’s Salt Lake friends who I have come to know a bit, and then started talking to the girl to my right; a lovely blue-eyed E.R. nurse with a fantastic smile.  She was funny and charming and admittedly I had started to develop a bit of a girl-crush on her immediately.

Erica saw us chatting and without warning said the one thing I would have never expected.

“Oh!  You two have something in common!  You both dated _______.”

Woah.  Wait.  What?

It’s true, my friends.  Unknowingly I had befriended my x-boyfriend’s x-girlfriend.  (Note: this particular x-boyfriend is not Berkley/Adam.  Erica is friends with half the planet, including another one of my x-boyfriends.)  Now, this could have been monumentally awkward, luckily it went the absolute other way.  After the initial shock wore off, we started tentatively chatting about our mutual X.  We talked about his humor, his smile, his quirks and peculiarities.  Yes, we talked about his kissing expertise (and even managed to survive the very bizarre moment when another girl at the table chimed in with her opinion–the boy gets around!  Goodness!) and after a little while it came time to make a choice.  Do we dare talk about The Hard Stuff? Or is it best to just skip that part all together.

Hard Stuff.  Every relationship has it.  Many relationships won’t survive it.  Ours clearly didn’t.

We talked a good long time about relationships in general, relationship specifics, pitfalls, communication, quirks and red flags.  Our respective relationships ended for similar reasons–we both wanted different things than our X.  One relationship lasted for over a year, the other for just a few months.  We had some very similar experiences, and some vastly different ones.  We both loved some of the same things and hated some of the same things.

As we continued to chat, to dissect, to compare I couldn’t help but wonder if this is what the wives from Big Love do on their “off nights.”

I am clearly not giving out many specifics here, partly because I have no real ill-will towards this particular x-boyfriend and while I have no problem discussing his faults with his other x-girlfriend, I don’t think that discussing his faults with the Internet is really appropriate.  Those details will be left to she and I–oh hell, I really do sound like a sister-wife!  Someone please send a plain-jane dress and a YouTube tutorial to achieve the perfect, coiffed, high-rise bangs.



The Butcher, The Baker, The Candlestick Maker, and The Boy Who Has Yet To Be Named finally gets a name.
2010 January 20, 5:13 am
Filed under: Bulldog A. McGunsmoke, Love 101, Relationships

In the last six months I have gone on approximately umpteen thousand dates.  Okay, that is a bit of an exaggeration, but prior to The Boy Who I Promise Will Be Named Later In This Post, I was a bit crazy.  After breaking off an 18-month relationship I went on kind of a dating rampage, which will not be discussed in much detail here.  Notable mentions are The Butcher, who has the notorious distinction of being the only boy who has ever broken up with me; The Baker, whose cookies and pastries were distracting from the unnerving, contentious and (eventually) yelling-and-crying-in-a-restaurant type of relationship; and The Candlestick Maker, who was so tall that even in my tallest heels (which put me at six feet) I hardly grazed his shoulder.  These “relationships” ranged from a few dates, to a few weeks, to a few months.  I also feel that it should be noted that The Butcher, The Baker, The Candlestick Maker, and The Boy not only all know each other, but are routinely invited to the same parties, functions and events.  Yeah, being in the same (suddenly much too small) room with all four of them was perhaps one of the more awkward moments of the last month.

Which brings me to The Boy Who Is About To Get A Name.  While we met in October and started dating soon after that, I have been hesitant to properly introduce him on ye olde blog.  Inexplicably, I’m all nervous about it, which is bizarre because I have sent novel-length emails to a half-dozen friends around the world about The Boy and how amazing he is and how fantastic everything is going, ad nauseum.  But I’m still nervous, however, nerves aside, here it goes.

The Boy is kind of a Jack Bauer type, the SuperHero guy who can save the world at a moment’s notice.  (Unlike Jack Bauer he does not routinely break dozens of federal laws or have the President’s cell phone number. And unlike Kiefer Sutherland he does not have a television series or criminal rap sheet.)  If they were in a fight, I think The Boy would totally beat Jack Bauer.  He runs a business where he actually trains other people to be Jack Bauer types.  And by “people” I mean SWAT teams and military teams are previous clients; seriously, he’s hardcore.  If something bad is happening, The Boy is the type you want to have around. I was surprised (and relieved) to discover a balance to all that testosterone, The Boy writes his own music, plays the guitar and sings.  And I know of no easier way to get me into full swoon mode than to have a big, strong, handsome man hang out in my living room playing his guitar and crooning.  Seriously swoony.

You want some more examples, don’t you.  Oh good, I thought you’d never ask.  (If you are the type to get squeamish or annoyed when hearing about someone gush over a new relationship, I advise you to skip to the end.  Seriously, gushing is about to happen, don’t say I didn’t warn you.)

“For Cute” Number A: The Boy and I had only gone on two dates before I went to Phoenix for Thanksgiving.  When I asked him if he’d mind picking me up at the airport and then maybe go out to lunch he agreed (squee!).  I was fully prepared to be blasted with Utah Winter Coldness as I waited at the pick-up point outside the airport, typical for arrivees at Salt Lake International.  You can imagine my shock when I saw him waiting there by the baggage claim.  Shock.  I don’t think I’ve had anyone meet me inside the airport since…um….the beginning of time.  Seriously, he parked, came in and waited.  I am still swooning over this.  (Also–this began what may go down in history as the best date ever.)

“For Cute” Number B: After a particularly long (90-hours plus) and exhausting week of work, The Boy sneakily made plans for a little surprise.  He arranged for a friend of his, a massage therapist, to come over to my apartment and give me an hour-long full-body massage while he did the dishes and cleaned up my kitchen.  For. Reals.  Who does that?!  Swoon!

“For Cute” Number C: While I was working during the Christmas holiday (and was pouting that so many of you had weeks of time off) he came to visit and brought a giant bouquet of red and yellow Gerbera daisies.  Daisies are my favorite flower and these were absolutely gorgeous.  Swoon!

“For Cute” Number D: On Christmas morning he arranged for Santa to visit and I opened my first Christmas-morning-present in a decade.  I laughed, I may have actually cried a bit, and I have loved seeing the way a pair of sparkly green sapphires look in my ears (not pictured below, heidikins fail.) Swoon!

“For Cute” Number E: Last week while I was in Disneyland “for work” he drove down to meet Vladd & I for a couple of days in The Happiest Place on Earth.  Turns out, Disneyland is a really great place to go on a date.  Noted.  And Swoon!

The Boy clearly needs an Internet name.  Potential options include the following:

  • Mr. Scrufftastic
  • Lover Boy
  • The Bulldog
  • Gunsmoke

This list has been seriously edited, my initial list was something like 13 nick-names long.  I like Scrufftastic and Lover Boy, but somehow they seem a bit derogatory in connotation–is that just me?  Yes, The Boy is scruffy, but it’s not his defining characteristic.  Yes, he’s swoony, but I can hardly think about calling him Lover Boy without conjuring up images from Dirty Dancing, and as much as I love Patrick Swayze–may he rest in peace–I don’t want him haunting my relationship.  That leaves Bulldog and Gunsmoke.  Wait…I can just call him Bulldog McGunsmoke and leave it at that, right?

Ladies and Gentlemen (the 2 who still read this blog with any regularity), The Boy Who Has Been Nameless for Months has finally been given a moniker: Bulldog A. McGunsmoke*.  BAM!

*Just to be clear, “A” is for AwesomeSauce.  Also, BAM! makes a much nicer acronym than BMG, which sounds like a sketchy multi-level-marketing company.



Never Have I Ever…
2009 December 16, 4:59 am
Filed under: Love 101

Let’s play a little game, shall we?

  • I have never broken a bone.
  • I have never gone snow skiing.
  • I have never been afraid of spiders.
  • I have never ridden an elephant.
  • I have never left the United States (unless you count the Canada side of Niagara Falls…which, let’s be honest, hardly counts).
  • I have never let a boy win to “save” his manhood or pride.
  • I have never shoplifted.
  • I have never dyed my hair.
  • I have never plucked or waxed my eyebrows. (Ow! Ow! Ow!)
  • I have never hiked to the top of Mt. Timpanogos.
  • I have never owned an iPod, or any of it’s wannabe’s.
  • I have never worried about going to lunch by myself, or a movie, or on vacation.
  • I have never understood imaginary numbers (or invisible numbers…whatever).
  • I have never been to Oregon (or Montana, or New Mexico).
  • I have never driven a motorcycle (ridden on one several times, love it!)
  • I have never been comfortable watching scary movies, particularly of the zombie variety.
  • I have never changed my favorite color–it’s always been green.
  • I have never liked goulash.  Ever.
  • I have never thought that living abroad was a bad idea.

Also, I have never had this much trouble coming up with a relationship-based sentence that begins with the statement “I have never”…I’m not sure how, exactly, to interpret this, but I have this gut feeling that it does not bode well for me or my reputation.  Ahem.

I’ve never kissed a girl, I suppose that’s something on the dating-relationship “I have never” list.  But that hardly seems like a significant achievement for me.  In the last ten years of dating I have cheated on boyfriends (this stopped when I was 20, I hardly feel I should really be held to it anymore, but it did happen), and I have had boyfriends (and one Doucheasaurus of an X-husband) cheat on me. I have told people I loved them, I have let the opportunity pass with words unspoken.  I have broken boys hearts (some kindly, and some not-so-kindly).  I have had my heart broken.  I have been kissed in the rain, have slow-danced in the moonlight, have gone on spontaneous vacations (some better than others).  I know what it’s like to kiss someone upside down (inspiration taken from the first Spiderman movie), or in the ocean, or…well…in a very large and unpublishable list of other places.  (You’re Welcome.)  I have dated someone long distance–Salt Lake to San Francisco–and I have dated someone who lived on my block.  I’ve dated someone younger than me, someone shorter than me, someone considerably older than me and someone considerably taller than me.  I’ve dated blonde boys, red-headed boys, dark-haired boys, bald boys, green eyed, blue-eyed, brown-eyed and black-eyed boys.  I have been engaged, married and divorced.

All that being said/admitted/confessed, there is just one more thing: Never have I ever felt like I could trust someone like I trust HIM.  Never have I ever felt as safe as I feel with HIM.  And never have I ever felt so wanted for the right reasons.

Who is HE, you ask?  Well, He will be making a blog appearance soon, but just know that he is absolutely Swoonalicious.



Let’s Talk About Boys
2009 November 16, 4:11 am
Filed under: Love 101

During my teenage years I was part of a girl group that got together once or twice a week to talk about the Super Important Things in Life.  Ya know, Life, God, Who We Are, Where We’re Going, Lip Gloss, The Latest From Lisa Frank, Leonardo DiCaprio, How to Marry Prince William, and Boys In General.

It was Awesome.  Clearly.

I vividly remember as part of these girly giggle-fests we would make lists that were importantly titled “Requirements for Future Husband” (what, like you didn’t do it too).  Fifteen years later I don’t think I could list more than two or three of those oh-so-important requirements, but I can almost guarantee that the “Tall, Dark & Handsome” trifecta was on there somewhere–which probably had everything a lot to do with my decade-long crush on B. who was tall, gorgeous, with dark hair and dark eyes.  The extent of this crush was really quite pathetic, and I am convinced that any “Requirements for Future Husband” list I wrote was (heavily) skewed to lead me to believe that B. was the only boy I could ever marry.

(For any interested parties, I did go on one date with B. when I was a Junior in high school, I asked him, it was horribly awkward and that was it.  Now we are Facebook friends and I still think he is gorgeous, in an appropriate “he’s married to someone else” kind of way, of course.  Ahem.)

Time moves on and I think there are only two or three of those giggly girls who are still single.  Single and Fabulous.  No question mark.  I don’t know about the others, but I have edited my “Requirements for Future Husband” list considerably.  For example:

Requirements for heidikins’ Future Husband List (circa 1996)

  • Tall, Dark, Handsome
  • Preferably Royalty
  • Or At Least Own A Castle Somewhere
  • Like on A Tropical Island
  • Actually, He Should Own The Island Too
  • Must Think Guinea Pigs are Adorable
  • Must Play the Saxophone (see: fit list to B’s qualities)
  • Must Want To Watch My Favorite Movies All The Time
  • Must Tell Me I’m Pretty Approximately 738 Times Per Day
  • Must Play Soccer (B. was a soccer player)
  • Must Be Super Manly
  • Should Bring Me Breakfast in Bed Every Day
  • Would Never Make Me Fold Socks, Because I Hate Folding Socks
  • And Dusting.  I Hate Dusting.
  • In Fact, He Should Do All The Laundry and Housework
  • Must Have A Private Jet (To Fly To His Island Castle, Obviously)
  • Must Like Taking Me To Big Fancy Balls and Costume Parties
  • Must Love Ponies
  • Must Think Mel Gibson (my creepy old man crush at the time) Is Amazing
  • ……….(ad nauseum)

In retrospect, this looks more like job requirements for a man-servant or a cabana boy, not a husband.  Thank heaven’s I’ve learned a few things, for example; Breakfast in Bed is rarely a good idea because you get crumbs in your sheets and syrup on your pillow case.  Now, I am still a sucker for brown eyes, but blue or green eyes are no longer a deal breaker like they were back then.  My current list looks something like this.

Requirements for heidikins’ Future Husband List (circa 2009)

  • Must be kind-hearted and honest.
  • Must love God.
  • Must never hurt me (or others) on purpose.
  • Must be hard-working.
  • Must be willing to work on our relationship (most people call this “communication”).
  • Must be willing to put “us” first*.
  • Must be sensitive enough to recognize an awkward, uncomfortable or harmful situation, and man enough to do something about it.  I don’t want a fence-sitter.

*I realize at times work requirements or other commitments needs to be first priority, temporarily. I understand project deadlines and other time-sensitive issues that need to be dealt with immediately.  However, I don’t want a relationship that always comes after work, after friends, after the gym.  I need more than that.  (The short of it is I never want to have the conversation that ends with “I’d rather have season tickets to [redacted sports team] than be happy with you.” again.  Ever.  I am worth more than a damn baseball team.)

I am well aware that there are more components that are required for a successful relationship; certain levels of chemistry should be in place.  There should be mutual interests or hobbies.  Similar feelings about the future, family, money, etc.  However, in the Big Picture way of things, my current list is what matters to me.  The rest is just details.

Do you/Did you have a list?  Does your current Significant Other fit most or all of your requirements?  What are your deal breakers?  What can you not live without?



Maybe I should just marry a Norwegian underwear model.
2009 September 23, 5:28 am
Filed under: Life 101, Love 101, Relationships

Let’s talk about dating for a minute, shall we?  Specifically, let’s talk about dating-to-get-engaged-and-then-subsequently-married. Now, before you get all excited, let me be perfectly clear.  Yes, I have recently tried the dating-to-get-engaged-and-then-subsequently-married thing.  If you recall, it didn’t work out that way.  I have also done the dating-just-to-be-dating thing with various levels of success.  However, currently I am single.  For the most part, I like dating.  I like getting to know people, I like going and doing things with people, I like the butterflies that can come from someone new and I like moving on if/when it is over. No harm, no foul.

Now, in my neck of the woods, ridiculously short courtships and engagements are par for the course.  I have known people to meet, start dating, and then get engaged in a few weeks and have a lovely wedding three months later.  Actually, this happens all the time.  (Out of staters, I know, this is crazy to you, but it’s “normal” and sometimes even “expected” here.  Don’t blow a gasket, yet.)  Many of these couples (several of my siblings included) are still happily married years later and starting families.  I couldn’t be more happy for them.

Immediately after I became single again (and after an appropriate mourning period) I went on a bit of a dating rampage.  A couple of weeks of multi-dates not only cured me of the habit but got me over the idea of kissing someone just to kiss them.  Confession: I have kissed boys simply to kiss them without any real feelings involved.  It happens.  Don’t judge.  Somewhere around the beginning of August one-such, um, episode, took place.  I met “Office Ink” about five years ago–at work, shockingly–and we dated a bit then, then a bit more a few months later, then a bit more a year or two after that, and then a bit more over the summer–somewhere between “I’m single…now what?” and “This is lame.”  Ink has some very nice qualities (which I will not discuss here because it makes me a bit nauseous to think about right now) and I suppose in the back of my mind he would always be there for good times.

Office Ink is engaged.  Facebook announced his relationship approximately 5 weeks ago with a mass of cutesy couple pictures (she is actually quite beautiful, I’ll give him that) and fun day trips.  Yesterday, Facebook announced his engagement.  Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!

Now, lest you think I am jealous or something–it’s not really that.  I know things could never have really worked out between Mr. Ink and I, he was fun to hang out with and we had a good time together, but it would never have gone farther than that.  I am actually happy for him.  Mostly.  (There is the whole coming-to-terms with the fact that I just wasn’t good enough for him what he was looking for.  And yes, this is probably compounded with the as-yet-unexpressed feelings of I just wasn’t what Handsome was looking for either.  My clinical-shrink-trained brain is telling me that there is a wonderful guy out there who is looking for someone like me, and it’s better to wait for Mr. Right than to get wrapped up with Mr. Not Quite Right But You’ll Do In A Pinch/Moment Of Desperation And Weakness Where I Have Convinced Myself That Unless I Settle For You I’ll End Up Alone With 37 Cats And A Whole Lot Of Crazy.  Really?  When I think about it, I don’t want to be with that guy.  Firstly, can you imagine fitting that last name on wedding invitations?  No thank you.)

Back to Office Ink.  He’s engaged.  He’s getting married in six weeks.  Six!  He started dating this girl at the beginning of August either a) right after he and I had our last fling-thing, or b) before he and I had our last fling-thing…at this point I’m not sure which is better, both are kind of gross to me, actually.  At any rate, by the end of August he was “officially” dating Miss Blue Eyes (because you know it isn’t official until Facebook or Google confirm it), engaged in September, wedding date set for the beginning of November.

Four months.  I’ve had blocks of parmesan for longer than that!

I am trying to be excited for him, but I can’t help but feel this impending cloud of doom.  Not necessarily for them, in the words of OPH, “I’m sure they’ll have a long and happy marriage”.  I just have this heart-sinking, stomach-wrenching fear that I’m doing it wrong.  Not the “being excited for an x-whatever who is getting married to someone he’s known for four months”, that doesn’t really matter in the long run and they are both adults (bona-fide adults, in their 30′s), they probably know what they are getting themselves in to.  I just have this nagging little voice in the back of my brain telling me that I’m doing it wrong.

“heidikins, most of your girlfriends from high school are married and on their second or third kid.”

“heidi-ho…the ones who don’t fit the description above are done with masters degrees and/or working on Ph.D.’s”

“heidster, everyone else is doing it, what’s wrong with you?”

“oh heidi-girl, what is it about you that makes men think you just aren’t good enough?”

…you can see where this ends up, right?  Yours truly will be ordering a male underwear model from Norway, convince him he will be the next Daniel Craig if he simply stars in my “reality TV” show (aptly named “heidikins and the Norwegian”), then dragging the poor scallywag down the aisle and forcing him to marry me.  For real, no fakesies.  Then I’ll fit in, right?  I’ll have it all!  I can announce my nuptials on Facebook and everyone will see how hunky and Viking-like Mr. Norway looks in our overly-posed, overly-styled photos.  We could honeymoon in the Greek Isles and I’m sure no one will notice the little “stock photo” watermarks on our souvenir snapshots.  In a year or so I could probably rent a kid or two to bulk up the “family” album and no one would be the wiser! It’s brilliant!

Ahem.

Or, I could just write incredulous real-time twitter updates and a subsequent blog post to cleanse these WTF feelings, go shopping for new outfits to become more appealing to men, go for a run, bake and consume another batch of cookies, ignore the masses and look forward to going out on a regular date, no strings attached.  Just because [insert copious numbers of "couples" here], or Office Ink and Miss Blue Eyes go and jump off the marriage cliff doesn’t mean I need to follow them.  I’m quite content where I am, thank you.  The view from the cliff-top is lovely.



Love/Hate: Writing Rut Edition
2009 August 14, 5:09 am
Filed under: Life 101, Lists, Love 101

Love: Blatantly stealing ideas from lovely bloggers.  Thank you Janet, for letting me unabashedly pilfer your Love & Hate format.

Hate: Janet is delightful, there is no reason to hate her.

Love: An inside hook-up to brand new superfast internet, being installed today.

Hate: The last 3 weeks of generally internetless existence.

Love: New “customer loyalty” phone plans with unlimited minutes and unlimited text messaging for $50.00 a month.  Seriously.  Love.

Hate: How slow the internet is on my phone.  I know, waaah, waaah, poor me, my portable-internet device takes 13 seconds to load a page.  Whatever, I don’t like it and would rather not have the internet on my phone at all.

Love: See above for “Superfast Internet”

Hate: Um…pokèmon?

Love: Meeting up with old friends and chatting until the wee hours of the morning.

Hate: That I don’t do this often enough.  Dear Friends, we need to hang out more.

Love: My new job.  Seriously, I try not to gush about it because I heart it so much I’m afraid I make people a bit nauseous.

Hate: That, in this economy, I have to be careful about gushing about a SuperFantastic job.

Love: My new boss brought me a 24-pack of Diet Dr. Pepper, my ultimate guilty pleasure, and a bottle of lime concentrate.  Diet Dr. Pepper with lime is the equivalent of hunky, half-clothed men feeding me grapes and fanning me with palm fronds.  Yum!

Hate: Diet Dr. Pepper with lime cannot be drunk after lunch or I will be up until 3:00 am, without question.  (See above, “talking to friends until o-dark-hundred.”)

Love: Brownies, cookies, cupcakes, and a deluge of carbs.

Hate: The squidgy section around my middle.  Seriously, people, I think I might also have cellulite on my calves, calfs, calvsies, calfi…not on my baby cows, but on my lower leg.

Love: (Or, at least “Like”) I got chatted up in the grocery store by a guy I have always respected and admired.  We went to the same elementary, junior high and high school; he was in my grade, he rarely, if ever, spoke to me.  He is popular, famous, a star athlete, tall, good looking, etc.  And, the other day in the grocery store, when I asked him point-blank if he was married, he answered “no”.  (Cue: heidikins’ heart flutter.)

Hate: That upon looking him up on Facebook it CLEARLY states in his profile “Married.”  FAIL!

Love Can Maybe Understand, If I Think Really Hard: The sick and twisted form of flattery, or whatever, under which this incident would be filed in a psychological sense.

Hate: The douche-pickelry.  Respect: lost.

What is on your love/hate list today?



…And when you get to the end, Stop.
2009 July 28, 10:33 am
Filed under: Handsome V, Love 101

Once upon a time…

(Yes, this is one of those fairy-tale posts, just humor me, okay?)

Once upon a time there was a girl and a boy.  Their story started like so many of these stories begin; lunch at a little Italian café. However, unlike most fairy tales, their story did not end with a castle and a pony and a wedding.  Their story doesn’t even end with a “happily ever after.”  Their story just ends.

Handsome & I are not together anymore.

Wow, it looks so final printed there in black and white.  The truth is there are about thirty-seven thousand shades of gray somewhere in the middle.  I love him, he is an absolutely amazing man and I want him to be happy.   I wanted things to work out between us in a castle-pony-wedding kind of way, but Real Life and fairy tales don’t match up all that often.

I know that some of you may be all concerned for my emotional well-being, I am actually doing alright.  The first few days were really hard, tears leaking out in meetings and while driving and at the grocery store and such, which I guess is normal.  I do have my incredibly sad moments, but overall I am okay.  I realize that I may be in complete denial or unnaturally emotionally healthy, and yes, I am going to see someone about that.  And that someone is not Ben or Jerry or the German philosopher Hagen-Dazs…although I have had some quality couch time with each of them.

I have been debating how to write this post—blogging about relationships is tricky, blogging about ending relationships is trickier, and blogging about ending relationships without placing undue blame or criticism on the other party is, well, it’s very careful business.  I don’t want to get into the emotional nitty-gritties, or the he said/she said play-by-play.  I don’t want a waterfall of pity.  I don’t want hurtful things said about Handsome.  I still care about him, and I will probably always care about him.  Things just didn’t work out.  And that’s okay too.




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.